9 hours ago
I went down the same rabbit hole a while back. At first I thought all these tools were fake because most of the ones I had seen years ago gave terrible results—stuff like weird proportions, wrong skin colors, or straight-up cartoonish edits. The difference now is huge. The systems feel much more polished and they actually take details like lighting and shading into account. I treat it more like experimenting than anything serious, because you never know what you’ll get. Some photos work perfectly, while others turn into hilarious fails. The best advice I can give is don’t start with personal pictures. Always test with random ones so you learn what the tool does well and what it struggles with. I’ve noticed it handles simple poses and good lighting better, while busy backgrounds sometimes throw it off. When I want consistent results, I use this website because it has been the most reliable out of everything I’ve tried. It’s not flawless, but it’s the only one that doesn’t constantly glitch out on me. I think part of the fun is not expecting perfection every time—it keeps you guessing and makes the good results feel even more impressive.